I’ve never really been into conspiracy theories, apart for entertainment reasons, but recently and for me more or less out of the blue the other day, Rogier Brussee mumbled something about Google being the CIA (or FBI for all that matters). Expressions like that make me cynical but also make me question why I am cynical about those ideas. Could it be true? Do you think it is like that? And if Google would be the digitized version of the all mighty watchdog of the US, than who would be the (moral) owners of Facebook, delicious, Foursquare, you name any social media originating from the US? If it really is the security forces of our modern western society, than let us ask what the role of social media in our society actually is.
Russia Today interviewed Julian Assange, Wikileaks’ co-founder who needs no further introduction. In his interview, Assange focuses particularly on Facebook calling it the “most appalling spy machine that has ever been invented”. Assange: “Facebook in particular is the most appalling spying machine that has ever been invented. Here we have the world’s most comprehensive database about people, their relationships, their names, their addresses, their locations and the communications with each other, their relatives, all sitting within the United States, all accessible to US intelligence. Facebook, Google, Yahoo – all these major US organizations have built-in interfaces for US intelligence. It’s not a matter of serving a subpoena. They have an interface that they have developed for US intelligence to use.”
According to Assange, it is not the case that Facebook is actually run bi US intelligence; US intelligence is able to bring to bear legal and political pressure on them. Besides that, the system is automated. It would be too costly and would take too many people to run through individual data of all who use Facebook, let alone in conjunction with other social media. We could draw the conclusion that whenever needed intelligence services (and most certainly not just US intelligence) will have straight forward access to relevant individual data, again: their relationships, their names, their addresses, their locations and the communications with each other, their relatives. You name it. Remains the question: do we want this? The Wikileaks founder warns Facebook users, stating that if a user adds their friend to Facebook, they are “doing free work for US Intelligence agencies, in building this electronic database for them”.
I have always been very easy on my personal data. I have only three email addresses a secure private one @hu.nl and a probably not so secure one @gmail.com. Then I have one @ymail due to the fact that I have recently opened a Flickr account to share some koninginnedag (queens day) pictures with friends with whom we had been selling stuff at Bloemgracht all day. What’s wrong with that? The pictures I took with my iPhone all have GPS data so you know I am not lying. But than again, how many people have put queens day photographs on Flickr this year? (I get 8,609 results at Flickr, May 3, 2011 10.50 AM.) Nobody seems to care much about privacy issues.
April 24, I published a copied story from The Next Web about not just iPhone keeping all our data in a little file in our phone but also Android (read Google) doing just the same (more or less). Obviously, if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear. So, who cares if Mr. Obama or premier Rutte is having a look in your whereabouts?
As I see it, it is as Alexander Bard said during The Next Web Conference; the next new thing is integrity. Integrity has to do with openness and even Satan can have integrity; as long as Satan says he is Satan, we will accept it. The moment one pretends to be someone else, evil starts, distrust, corruption, blurriness. Intelligence services? How many sides to a coin?
tagged with: alexander bard, android, cia, fbi, flickr, julian assange, the next web, facebook, iphone, wikileaks
Related posts
-
Tweet
by Kees Winkel -
The tempations of becoming a pirate
by Erik Hekman -
A personal history of gadgets
by Dick Swart -
I am Niniane Veldhoen, and I am addicted to Mafia Wars
by Niniane Veldhoen -
How will I get my iFix?
by Thomas Tijdink -
I want my mobile!
by Jeroen van Leeuwen -
The Privacy issue
by Matthijs Rotte -
“Agorastis and Iphoné”
by Dick Swart -
Creative or not? That’s the question.
by Niniane Veldhoen -
A trip down memory lane
by Erik Hekman
Other posts by Kees
- I control my data therefor I am
- Would Plato’s Cyborg be male?
- Frictionless Sharing: a critical view on automated sharing of media texts in social media
- Fascinating
- The Battles are on!
- Stats
- Trends in Mobile according (self-proclaimed) experts
- What’s Augmented Reality?
- Welcome back
- The paradox in iCloud


Comments
My conspiracy theory is that somebody at the CIA (well the NSA really) back in the mid 1990’s said “what are we doing with the internet???”. The NSA runs the computers the networks and the antenna dishes for spying on the Russians during the cold war and everybody else ever since. At the time they ran things like Echelon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Echelon_%28signals_intelligence%29. They are smart and they a run a billions of dollars of budget (nobody knows for sure but probably more than the CIA and then there is a vast overlap with military intelligence see e.g. http://www.fas.org/irp/commission/budget.htm which might be a decoy as it is given by google :-)). Anyway, at the time the time the search engine of choice was AltaVista. But it was dying because at the time it was well known that nobody wants to pay for search. Enter Page and Brin with Pagerank. Pagerank is a something really simple: it is just the stationary distribution of the Markov chain of surfers hopping randomly over the weblinks. It always exists and is unique unless there are periodic orbits, quod non for a graph like the web. So if you now think, yea right, I may be internet investor but I am not a fool that is easily impressed by some math mumbo jumbo, you would be just like most venture capitalists in the mid 1990’s. But if you’d work at NSA, you would have about 10000 colleagues who would instantly recognise this as the Perron Frobenius theorem, and as an obviosly sane idea. And they might actually have read Page and Brin’s paper (http://ilpubs.stanford.edu:8090/422/1/1999-66.pdf) Incidently, they also state in a paper that we need a free and transparant search engine. But more to the point, it would be no problem for the NSA to fund an upstart company with a few 10’s of millions of dollars to set up a search engine as a cover for spying on the web. Who cares if it loses money, by intelligence standards it is dirt cheap! And the _first_ thing you want to do is track what is linking what, so Pagerank is the perfect cover up, whether it works or not. They will also very quickly have found out that search queries are an intelligence goldmine, and it is information people provide voluntarily so (I may be wrong here) it can also be used to spy on Americans. The kind of analysis you have to do for adsense is also ideally suited to filter out potential intelligence targets: if adsense can find out that you are looking for a nice place for the weekend to drink belgian beer with your middle class friends based on your searching an surfing behaviour, it can also find out that you need a safe house to brew some heavy explosives with your extremist friends. And ofcourse google actually worked and works, because they know how to run the enormous amounts of equipment and the nasty reallife consequences of buggy document formats all of which the NSA must have had a lot of expertise in. Last not least, google actually makes money so the cover up pays for itself, so it scales! It is like the Pizza Connection, pizzerias set up by the maffia to distribute drugs. I read somewhere that the mob quickly came to realise that selling good Italian Pizza made good money. Apart from the money is money thing, that legal revenue gave them lot of operational freedom. In the same way Google making money, means that you don’t have to go ask for money from nosey and stingey politicians who at the time had only just got woken up to the internet with the exception of Al Gore.
So is true I don’t know? Have I learned things that make it look like a silly paranoia theory? Unfortunately, not at all. In fact it does not matter whether Google, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, LinkedIn, or Micrsoft word for that matter are invented by the NSA or not. It is so glaringly obviously useful for an intelligence operation to massively filter and index text and track search queries, that I cannot believe that 10 years on in the war on terror they don’t have access to the information. So what Assange says is completely believable to me. Likewise I am not all surprised that the location information in our phones, and the network connections we make are tracked 24/7. People are very weary for being visually monitored by camera, but If I would run an intelligence operation, and I would have to choose Google data and mobile phone data or a camera in every house I would only hesitate for about a 1 milisecond.
Rogier
cheap oakley sunglasses are sold here for all age groups and come in a complete array of shades, models and styles.At our oakley sunglasses cheap, you can buy oakley sunglasses discount with high quality, save up to 80%,our oakley sunglasses on sale online store 100% Quality Guarantee,Low Price,Fast Shipping & No Sales Tax,Fast Service,Safe Transaction,Good Reputation!Top reasons to buy from http://www.cheapoakleysunglassesonsale.net
Welcome to Coach outlet store online.In here you can buy the newest 2012
Authentic coach outlet handbags,enjoy more than 70% discount Coach outlet product.All Coach outlet products are highest quality and depend on the quality of durable, exquisite craftsmanship, they establish solid reputation on the consumers worldwide. Discount Coach Bags and Purses Clearance latest style hot sale at
Coach outlet store,
Coach outlet online,
Coach outlet and
Coach outlet 2012.Coach outlet online price up to 70% Off! Competitive prices on our website will save you much and you’ll get full refund when the item is not available in stock.
New Cheap jeremy scott,Adidas wings 2.0,Adidas wings,Adidas originals hardland,Jeremy scott white black,Adidas wings silver,Obyo jeremy scott hoodie,Jeremy scott ballerina for sale on adidaswingsjeremyscott.com ,with lowest price and fast shipping worldwide.
Comment on this post