Off course this statement is an exaggeration. Sorry! But recently I stumbled upon an interesting research by Harvard about how people use Twitter. The researchers questioned over 300,000 Twitter users and found that most Twitter users are merely followers. Half of Twitter users tweet once very 74 days, 25% of the users never tweet and 10% of Twitter users account for over 90% of tweets. This is an even smaller percentage than people contributing 90% to Wikipedia (15%). In the comments on second state of dutchtwitosphere you will find similar numbers on the Twitter users in The Netherlands: “50% of the Dutch Twitter accounts have less then 12 updates. 5% of the Dutch Twitter accounts have more then 550 updates”.
The researchers conclusion is therefore that Twitter is more of a one-way, broadcasting tool than a two-way, peer-to-peer communication network. Guess we knew this. However, used in this way it can be very effective, as we have seen during the Obama campaign. But also for commercial reasons Twitter can be very effective as the case of the computer company Dell shows. They have been active on Twitter for the past two years and made more than one million dollars on Twitter sales in half a year (total over the two years is three million dollars). Not bad. They post about 6 – 19 times a week on Dell Outlet and almost every post includes a link to a sale (about half are Twitter-exclusive deals). On YouTube they explain how and why. Another nice example is a New Orleans based pizza company. They use Twitter locally and their sales have gone up 20%. Dutch companies are slowly following these examples with Telfort and UPC in the lead. Will others follow?
By the way: another interesting bit of information derived from the Harvard study: it seems that on Twitter men are mainly interested in men (65% of them only follow tweets by other men). Is it really a men’s world?
tagged with: twitter, social media
Related posts
-
Learning about social networks through Twitter.
by Kees Winkel -
Looking Back at the Museums and the Web 2009 Conference
by Erik Hekman -
Social Media Monitor
by Harry van Vliet -
Just call me 3,141,592,653 of 7,851,455,000
by Erik Hekman -
Tweet
by Kees Winkel -
Information Overflow
by Kees Winkel -
Social Supermarkets
by Matthijs Rotte -
Generation Dumbstein
by Dick Swart -
Social Media Gnomes!
by Erik Hekman
Other posts by Yvonne
- How dumb do we want to be?
- Twitter revolution
- So, which trend is really dangerous?
- Is neuroscience telling us how to vote?
- Media: emotion or reason?
- Does tweeting win you elections?
- Social media an other diversion?
- Back to the future?
- This is cool!
- Push or Pull?


Comments
“The researchers conclusion is therefore that Twitter is more of a one-way, broadcasting tool than a two-way, peer-to-peer communication network.” Well… I strongly disagree. Looking at the statistics you might conclude this, but if you look within the 10% of active users it’s most definitely a peer-to-peer communication tool.
The “problem” I guess is that all accounts are taken into consideration, while many accounts are either spam, placeholders (I have 4 of these myself) or people who registered only to have one look. If you’d get rid of these accounts in the stats and only take a look at the really active users (online at least once a week or something), I guess findings will be rather different.
Curious to see some stats on this.
Comment on this post